The Greatest Guide To h4831sc load data
The Greatest Guide To h4831sc load data
Blog Article
Given that there doesn't appear to be any "official" Load Data on the market for this Load, can many of you supply a starting point with this mixture and points to think about when working this Load up?
They have got carried out identically for me. Like everyone else I rushed to have the newer SC Variation but have now switched again. Preferably you want about one hundred% loading density. Should you have sufficient scenario ability to the H4831(extended) you might be in all probability improved off.
It truly is likely that no even more dialogue is required, where case we advocate setting up a fresh thread. If having said that you feel your response is needed you could continue to do so.
I've had a handful of rifles that fouled genuinely negative. Getting many of the copper out was a true PIA until eventually I found Wipe-Out foaming bore cleaner.
IMR powders also preform properly for me with just one notable exception. All of the chrongraphing I have carried out with them implies the velecity is consistant higher than 32 degrees but starts to vary as soon as the temp begins to drop. The closer to zero I get the greater they fluctuate. I have found just as much as 250 fps in a 10 shot string with my 243 and 223 in the Wintertime time around in this article. Have not seen this with many of the other powders.
I've utilized H4831 and H4831SC in my 260 Rem without distinction. The one thing will be the brief Slash offers you a little bit more Area. Fantastic luck!gun)
If there is no load data it is actually due to h4831sc load data the fact this powder just isn't suitable for this cartridge. Commonly one particular won't discover one powder to fit all cartridges, and the relatives of cartridges with the particular powder (4831SC) that you'll h4831 vs h4831sc be asking about won't perform.
excaliber claimed: I have discovered the exact opposite for being genuine in my gun. H4831SC was the slowest powder with 180 g Accubonds. RL22 was a considerably faster and equally accurate powder in my three hundred Get Mag.
The main reason I switched from IMR 4831 to H4831 was to make the most of the temperature insensitivity of the Hodgdon Severe powder.
[email guarded] gn and 115 CT's, I've killed extra Deer using this type of combo than all the rifles I own put together, Operate approximately this even so the sweet spot will probably be about fifty four, I'm a Two Bit-06 nut and I've some stuff tat functions rather well for me If the intrigued
Regardless of the similarity in nomenclature, They are wholly different powders, with IMR 4831 becoming substantially more quickly as opposed to Hodgdon variants. Really don't take care of them as the exact same powder, since they most absolutely are usually not.
I exploit fifty two grs H4831sc by using a 117gr Hornady BTSP. It truly is correct, gentle mannered, and knocks whitetails down DRT. If it was me, I'd personally h4831 vs h4831sc get started at fifty two gr and operate up.
Both contain the Identical burn off level, quick Slice comes in useful if you are at max fill and not at strain/velocity that you might want you can get much more shortcut inside of a case.
I discovered that my 7mag a hundred and sixty partitions have been sub MOA with 4831sc with reduced to min charges. I’m conversing 2700 (possibly 2800) fps, it was a low 60s grain cost within a Norma case. Not what I used to be trying to find, but accurate Even so.